Banned Weapons, explained

October 19, 2025

 

International treaties ban some types of weapons for being cruel or uncontrollable.

 

However, banned weapons are still used in conflicts.

 

For example:

  • Eastern European states (like Poland and Finland) are bringing back anti-personnel mines to place on the border with Russia. These are banned because they remain after conflicts end, killing and injuring civilians later.

  • Cluster munitionshave been used by both Russia and Ukraine since 2014. Banned by most countries in 2008, cluster bombs separate into smaller bomblets and target a wide area.

  • Israelused incendiary (fire-setting) weapons in southern Lebanon and Gaza. These bombs are designed to set an object or an area on fire, causing unnecessary destruction and deaths.

 

Some countries, including China, Russia and the US did not sign some of the treaties banning these weapons.

 

International organisations often fail to control or punish their use.

 

We have a separate report covering the geopolitics of nuclear weapons.

 

Conventional weapons do not always kill many people but can cause unnecessary or uncontrolled suffering to both civilians and soldiers.

 

help us stay independent

Become a Founding Member today.

 

We need your support to remain a reader-powered project.

Join, or explore perks

 

Chemical weapons

Did not join the ban: Egypt, Israel, North Korea, South Sudan.

 

Chemical weapons are toxic substances that kill or harm people.

 

These are considered especially cruelbecause of the long-term suffering they cause.

 

A chemical agent can be delivered with a bomb, a grenade or even an artillery shell.

  • Choking agents: targets breathing, attacking lungs and airways.

  • Blistering agents: causes burns and scarring on skin and eyes.

  • Nerve agents: attacks the nervous system, causing body failure.

 

Chemical weapons were widely used during the First World War.

 

In total, around 100,000 soldiers were killed, with over a million injured.

 

Around 20,000 people, including civilians, were killed by Iraqi chemical attacks on Iran.

 

The 1925 Geneva Protocol banned the use of chemical and biological weapons.

 

However, the production and storage of the weapons were banned in 1997.

 

All officially declared stockpiles of chemical weapons have been destroyed by 2023.

 

However, countries continue to develop new, uncontrolled substances, that are not included on the list of chemical weapons.

  • For example, Russian opposition leader, Alexey Navalny, and other figures were poisoned with a nerve agent weapon developed by Russia.

 

Over 300 chemical weapons attacks occurred during the civil war in Syria.

 

In 2013, more than 1,700 civilians were killed in a single attack by the forces of Bashar Assad.

 

After the attack, the international community pressured Syria to join the Chemical Weapons Convention and destroy its official stockpiles.

 

 

Biological weapons

Did not ban: ​Israel, Egypt, Syria and other smaller states.

 

A biological weapon uses pathogens (like bacteria, viruses or fungi) to kill or harm.

 

Unlike conventional weapons, their destructive power lies in causing a disease, which can spread and affect both military and civilian populations.

 

Biological agents can trigger epidemics.

 

They also create psychological terror: the fear of an invisible infection can destabilise a country’s public life.

 

Biological weapons can be delivered with regular weapon systems or by contaminating an area, a food or water source, or packages.

  • In 1346, Mongol forces catapulted plague-infected bodies over the city walls of Genoa, spreading the disease among the defenders.

 

The bioweapons development and research program run by Japan in the 1930s and 40s carried out experiments on mostly Chinese but also Russian, Korean and other civilians.

Victims were infected with pathogens, injured, burned and later studied to advance medical knowledge for the treatment of Japanese soldiers.

 

Countries including Germany, the Soviet Union, the US and the UK also pursued biological warfare programs.

 

Unlike the Chemical Weapons Convention, the Biological Weapons Convention has no verification mechanism: no international agency to inspect the countries.

 

This lack of oversight leaves space for secret programs.

 

In 2001, soon after the 9/11 attack on the US, Al-Qaeda terror group sent letters with deadly anthrax bacteria to some politicians and media in the US, killing 5 people, injuring 17 and causing thousands to undergo treatment.

 

Conventional weapons

 

In 1983, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) entered force.

 

It bans:

  • Non-detectable fragments, which break into pieces that cannot be detected in the human body, making treatment almost impossible.

  • Mines and booby traps, requiring land mines to be detectable and recorded.

  • Incendiary weapons, which cause fires such as napalm and white phosphorus.

 

Blinding lasers, banning weapons that target eyesight.

 

The CCW also covers the explosive remnants of war, requiring states to clear unexploded bombs and shells.

 

Cluster bombs are prohibited under a 2008 convention.

 

United States, Russia, China and Ukraine did not sign it.

 

Another convention bans “weather warfare”: the manipulation of environment or climate to wage war.

 

This was initially a response to US practices during the Vietnam War:

  • Cloud seeding operations to intensify rainfall, turning supply routes into mud and making roads impassable.

  • Agent Orange, a chemical sprayed over forests that destroyed leaves, denying cover to the Vietnamese troops.

 

There are discussions of a ban on lethal autonomous weapons (drones and systems that can select and attack targets without direct human control).

 

Artificial Intelligence and automated systems are already used to process information on the battlefield and even make decisions.

  • For example, Israel uses such systems to inform its targeting for the strikes on Gaza.

 

Thank you for reading!

 

Next week, we are publishing a report focused on the war in Gaza.

Are there any specific questions that you want us to dive deeper into?

Please reply to this email with any comments.

Author Simone Chiusa

Editor Anton Kutuzov

More below:

Join the discussion:

Thank you for reading!

Please become a Founding Member to support our independence and get perks - vote on future topics, join our research and receive the weekly special:

NEWS BREAKDOWN

Facts behind the headlines

This week: US Strikes on Iran’s Nuclear Sites

Join or Explore More

BECOME A FOUNDING MEMBER!

HELP US STAY INDEPENDENT

Find Out More